|
The year of 2023 marks the 20th anniversary of the establishment of the
comprehensive strategic partnership between China and the European Union, and
this year the 24th China-EU Summit on Dec 7 will return to offline sessions for
the first time since 2019. In June 2023, the EU unveiled its Joint Communication on a European Economic
Security Strategy, emphasizing a three-pronged approach in its relations with
China. It formally introduced “de-risking” as a strategic approach toward China,
aiming to enhance Europe’s independence in critical technological areas and raw
materials supply, as well as the autonomy of production chains, considering them
as serious threats to European economic security. This move seeks to diminish
the capabilities of “strategic competitors” like China while maintaining
cooperation in the majority of goods and services trade between China and
Europe. It is essential to note that this approach does not imply complete
“decoupling”. Currently, Sino-European relations confront challenges amid geopolitical
competition. The European strategy toward China, particularly its emphasis on
risk reduction, may intensify tensions between China and Europe, posing
challenges to practical cooperation between the two sides. In essence, “de-risking” reflects a form of “trade protectionism” that
contradicts the principles of market economy and free trade rules. Fears among
EU member states stemming from China’s substantial trade surplus has made them
attribute it to what they perceive as China’s strong government intervention.
Consequently, the EU has gradually implemented restrictive measures on China’s
high-tech industries, such as limitations on importing chip materials and
launching anti-subsidy investigations into low-cost Chinese electric vehicles.
These actions aim to curb the development of Chinese enterprises in Europe. From a formal perspective, the EU’s “de-risking” policy largely appears to
blindly follow the diplomatic route of the United States, which doesn’t align
with European interests. Despite the US and Europe’ different positions on
China, there is a gradual convergence in rhetoric, and both sides are leveraging
their dominant international mechanisms globally to collaboratively advance the
“de-risking” process against China. This implies that Europe is compelled to
sacrifice its own interests in China to serve the strategic objectives of the
US. Undoubtedly, this compromises the strategic autonomy emphasized by the EU,
proving detrimental to the development of friendly EU-China relations and the
realization of each country’s individual interests in the international
community. From the perspective of outcomes, the de-risking policy not only fails to
alleviate the security concerns that the EU harbors but also inflicts a
significant blow to the collaborative relationship between China and Europe,
introducing substantial risks to the deeply intertwined global economy. The core
of the EU’s de-risking lies in the economic domain. The strategy underscores the
need for the EU to enhance its competitiveness, strengthen the unity of the
European market, and intensify efforts in human capital and skill development.
The EU seeks to maintain its leading position in the fields of health, digital,
and clean technologies, aiming to mitigate risks associated with dependence on a
single supply source. In the present context, where China plays a prominent role in global economic
growth, reducing economic ties with China would exacerbate the challenges of
addressing the sluggish recovery of the world economy. This approach represents
a disruption to international cooperation, undermining the previously
established cooperative ecosystem and preventing the international community
from rallying collective efforts to tackle global risks. The EU should adapt to
the current situation and, in various domains, propel the deepening of
cooperation with China. First, cooperation between China and the EU is a pragmatic move and a
significant boon for EU member states. There is no consensus among EU member
states on the de-risking policy. Instead, internal disagreements exist over its
perceived radical and hasty nature. Some argue for a more open attitude toward
engaging and cooperating with China. The burgeoning collaboration in the
Chinese-German new energy vehicle industry and comprehensive cooperation in the
aviation manufacturing and materials sector between China and France exemplify
the positive dynamics. The positive interactions between the two major economies
in the EU can play a leading role in fostering China-EU cooperation.
Additionally, the EU should break free from political and ideological
constraints, redefining China’s international role and the China-EU partnership.
It should fully recognize China’s commitment to initiatives such as the Belt and
Road, the concept of a community with a shared future for mankind, and global
development proposals that reflect a responsible approach by a major nation
willing to share development benefits with the world. Capitalizing on the precious opportunity presented by the upcoming leadership
summit, and leveraging the growing consensus on deepening economic and trade
cooperation between China and Germany, as well as the supportive forces within
the European Parliament, efforts should be made to restart the Comprehensive
Agreement on Investment. This could open a new chapter in the all-encompassing
development of China-EU relations. Second, there remains extensive room for cooperation between China and the EU
in the fields of economy and trade, as well as collaborative efforts in climate
governance related to clean energy, green manufacturing and sustainable
transportation. Since the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, China and the
EU have jointly shouldered international responsibilities in geopolitical and
international crisis management. Third, amid the intensifying competition among major powers, China and the
EU, as significant proponents of globalization, need to unite and support each
other to collectively promote global peace and prosperity. The tactical easing
of tensions between China and the US has removed some obstacles for the China-EU
leaders’ summit. However, it’s vital for the EU to strengthen strategic
autonomy. Looking ahead at the international landscape, the enduring uncertainty and
risks in the relationship between China and the US underscore the crucial role
of China-EU relations in advancing global peace and prosperity. In the short
term, China-EU cooperation is beneficial for fostering a positive collaborative
environment; in the long term, it will contribute to the capacity building and
strategic autonomy of the EU. China-EU cooperation is an inevitable choice for China and Europe in
promoting national economic development and safeguarding core national interests
in the contemporary era. It is also a necessary means to drive global stability
and prosperity. The EU should seize the opportunity presented by the China-EU
leaders’ summit, discard the erroneous perception of de-risking, and continually
deepen the comprehensive strategic partnership between China and the EU.
Together, they can promote the stability and long-term development of bilateral
relations.
| 
Related News
